Legal Opinion

Poddar v. Department of Revenue

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1999No. OTC 3773; SC S44343PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDurham, J.

Taxpayer appeals a judgment entered after the Oregon Tax Court dismissed his amended complaint for failure to state a claim. Taxpayer contends that, although his amended complaint challenged the assessed value of on his property, his amended complaint is sufficient. Taxpayer further challenges discovery orders issued by the Tax Court. We review for errors of law. ORS 305.445. 1 We conclude that taxpayer’s amended complaint states a claim. We also conclude that the Tax Court committed no error regarding the discovery orders. Accordingly, we reverse the judgment and remand the case to the Tax…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. KennedyOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State v. QuinnOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  4. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  5. State v. MoylettOregon Supreme Court · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Patton v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 2005
  2. Atkinson v. GURICHSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
  3. Atkinson v. GURICHSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
  4. Bleoaja v. Department of Revenue, Tc 4930 (or.tax 7-19-2010)Oregon Tax Court · 2010
  5. Daniels v. Yamhill County Assessor, Tc-Md 110249d (or.tax 7-7-2011)Oregon Tax Court · 2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API