Atkinson v. GURICH
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
KAUGER, J.;
T1 The issue presented is whether the trial court abused its discretion in ruling that the county assessor can enter the home of a taxpayer who challenged the assessor's fair market value assessment. The fourth amendment of the United States Constitution,1 and art. 2, § 80 of the Okla. Const., protect the right of the people to be secure in their houses and effects against unreasonable searches. These protections are incorporated into 68 0.9$.2001 § 2818(C)(1) and (D)2 which prohibit the county assessor from entering the home of a taxpayer, unless the taxpayer requests a visual…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. HaydenSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- New Jersey v. T. L. O.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Jones v. State ex rel. Office of Juvenile AffairsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
- IN THE MATTER OF THE ASSESSMENTS FOR TAX YEAR 2012 OF CERTAIN PROPERTIESSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2021
- CITY OF OKLAHOMA CITY v. FONDRENCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2022
- Atkinson v. GURICHSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
- Kimble v. KimbleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.