Legal Opinion

USAA CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY v. Yaconiello

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided December 2, 1983No. Record 810830PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRussell, J.

The sole question presented in this appeal is whether the medical payments provision in an automobile insurance policy, purporting to cover the named insured and his relatives when “struck by an automobile,” affords coverage for injuries sustained when such a person is struck by a motorcycle.

The facts are stipulated. William Yaconiello had an automobile policy with USAA which purported to cover reasonable medical expenses incurred by the “named insured and each relative” who “sustains bodily injury, caused by accident . . . through being struck by an automobile or by a trailer of any type.”

Ger…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. DuncanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1962
  2. Scholz v. Standard Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of Virginia · 1926
  3. Stanley v. TomlinSupreme Court of Virginia · 1925
  4. Drewry v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Virginia · 1963
  5. Manufacturers Life Insurance Co. v. JohnsonDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1974

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hill v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Virginia · 1989
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. GandySupreme Court of Virginia · 1989
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. SeaySupreme Court of Virginia · 1988
  4. First SEC. Bank of Searcy v. DoeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  5. Therchik v. Grant Aviation, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2003

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API