Legal Opinion
Scholz v. Standard Accident Insurance
Supreme Court of Virginia
Decided September 23, 1926PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBurks, J.
There is a preliminary motion to dismiss this writ of error because of a failure to comply with section 6252 of the Code, as amended by Acts of 1924, p. 62, declaring: “But before the court or judge in vacation shall sign any bill of exceptions so tendered, it shall appear in writing that the opposite party or his attorney has had reasonable notice of the time and place- at which said bill of exception is to be tendered to the court or judge.”
The statute is an important one, and compliance with it is necessary to the validity of the bill of exception; but how must such compliance be…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Orient Insurance v. DaggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Insurance Co. v. NortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Trustees of the First Baptist Ch. v. . Brooklyn Fire Ins.New York Court of Appeals · 1859
- Whitfield v. Aetna Life Ins. Co. of HartfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Miller v. Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Lawrence v. NelsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1960
- Drewry v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Virginia · 1963
- Powell v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1928
- Grimes v. CrouchSupreme Court of Virginia · 1940
- Allstate Insurance Company v. DoodyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.