Legal Opinion

Stanley v. Tomlin

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided September 17, 1925PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

This action was brought by the administrator of the estate of Bernice V. Tomlin to recover damages for the death of plaintiff’s intestate, alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the defendant.

There was a trial by a jury which resulted in a verdict for the plaintiff in the sum of $6,500. The court refused to set aside the verdict and entered judgment for the plaintiff, and it is this judgment we are now asked to review.

The facts in the case, as proven by the plaintiff, are as follows:

On the 30th day of September, 1923, the plaintiff’s, decedent, Bernice V. Tomlin, an infant nine…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of Norfolk v. AnthonySupreme Court of Virginia · 1915
  2. Mapp v. HollandSupreme Court of Virginia · 1924
  3. Williams v. Lynchburg Traction & Light Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1925
  4. Foster v. CurtisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Fulton v. Chouteau County Farmers' Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Morris v. PeytonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1927
  3. Esteban v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 2003
  4. Young v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2007
  5. Tugman v. Riverside & Dan River Cotton MillsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1926

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API