Legal Opinion

Union Pacific Railroad v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided November 8, 2001No. 00CA0965PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Chief Judge HUME.

In this insurance coverage dispute, plaintiff, Union Pacific Railroad Company, as successor in interest to the Denver and Rio Grande Western Railroad Company (Rio Grande), appeals the district court's summary judgment entered in favor of defendants, Michigan Mutual Insurance Company (Michigan Mutual) and Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London and Certain London Market Insurance Companies (London Insurers). We affirm.

This case arises out of underlying litigation between plaintiff and the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The EPA sued Rio Grande…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Browder v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  2. Cedar Lane Investments v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Farmers Insurance Exchange v. American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1995

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Miller v. BrannonColorado Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. Leprino v. Nationwide Property & Casualty Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. Village Homes of Colorado, Inc. v. Travelers Casualty & Surety Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Neuromonitoring Associates v. Centura Health Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. Portercare Adventist Health System v. LegoColorado Court of Appeals · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API