Legal Opinion · Concurrence

United States v. Catrett

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided September 19, 2001No. 01-0042/AFPublished

1ConcurrenceCrawford, Chief Judge

I agree with the majority’s discussion of Issues II and III. However, as to Issue I, I agree with the military judge that a “[pjolice-man’s ... uncommunicated decision to arrest ... does not bear on whether the suspect is in custody.” Based on the facts and this conclusion of law, she correctly held that appellant was not in custody.

FACTS

After returning home from a 2 months’ deployment, appellant became convinced that his best friend, A1C Walker, had began a sexual relationship with appellant’s wife. In Walker’s presence, appellant’s wife said she wanted to leave him. Appellant than “struck…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Stansbury v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. California v. BehelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Dickerson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API