Aetna Building & Loan Ass'n v. Rouch
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Kingfisher County; A. H. Huston, Judge. Action by the Aetna Building & Loan Association against Sarah Rouch and another. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
ROSSER, C.
This was a suit by the Aetna Building & Loan Association against Frank and Sarah Rouch to foreclose a mortgage on certain real property in Kingfisher. ^ The mortgage was on a regular form of the association and was given to secure the payment of a note for $735 due on or before ten years after its date with interest at six per cent, per annum from date until paid. The note also provided for the payment of a premium of $4.35 per month. The note and mortgage is silent as to the amount of dues to be paid each month, but it seems that. $5 per month dues were paid on two shares…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Washington Investment Ass'n v. StanleyOregon Supreme Court · 1901
- Borrowers' & Investors' Building Ass'n v. EklundIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
- Jamieson v. JurgensIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
- Mutual Home & Savings Ass'n v. WorzSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
3Cited by11 opinions
- Union Savings Ass'n v. CumminsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Methvin v. American Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
- Holt v. Aetna Bldg. Loan AssociationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Midland Savings & Loan Co. v. DeatonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Midland Savings & Loan Co. v. HendersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.