State v. Poston
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, P. J.
Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for six counts of promoting prostitution, ORS 167.012, and 26 counts of identity theft, ORS 165.800. He contends that the indictment was legally defective because it did not expressly allege a basis for joining multiple counts in a single indictment or otherwise allege facts showing that the charges were properly joined and, consequently, that the trial court erred in denying his demurrer to the indictment. Defendant also assigns error to the court’s acceptance of nonunani-mous guilty verdicts. We reject the latter assignment without discussion and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- State v. LaundyOregon Supreme Court · 1922
- State v. GibsonOregon Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. HuennekensOregon Supreme Court · 1966
- State v. EberhardtCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
3Cited by27 opinions
- State v. PostonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
- State v. TaylorOregon Supreme Court · 2019
- State v. ClardyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
- State v. WarrenOregon Supreme Court · 2018
- State v. HajiOregon Supreme Court · 2020
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.