State v. Poston
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, P. J.
The state has petitioned for reconsideration of our decision in this case in which we held that ORS 132.560 requires the state to allege in a charging instrument the basis for joinder of the crimes charged in it. State v. Poston, 277 Or App 137, 144-45, 370 P3d 904 (2016). It contends that we erred in our construction of the statute and in our disposition of the case. We grant the state’s petition but adhere to our decision on reconsideration.
As we recognized in our original opinion, ORS 132.560 specifies the grounds on which charges may be joined in a charging instrument. The requirements…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- State v. PostonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- State v. HuennekensOregon Supreme Court · 1966
- State v. MolverCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
- State v. MOLVEROregon Supreme Court · 2010
3Cited by24 opinions
- State v. TaylorOregon Supreme Court · 2019
- State v. ClardyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
- State v. WarrenOregon Supreme Court · 2018
- State v. HajiOregon Supreme Court · 2020
- State v. MarksCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.