Legal Opinion

Waldo v. Journal Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1969No. 9PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkie, J.

One issue is dispositive of this appeal. It is whether the language complained of could reasonably be construed in its proper context as being defamatory to the plaintiffs.

We must first consider whether the language complained of is defamatory within the meaning of the Restatement test which this court has often quoted with approval: 2

“A communication is defamatory if it tends so to harm the reputation of another as to lower him in the estimation of the community or to deter third persons from associating or dealing with him.” 3

To sustain the demurrer, it must be determined as a matter of law…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lathan v. Journal Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Frinzi v. HansonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Ranous v. HughesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Meier v. MeurerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Leuch v. BergerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Dworkin v. L.F.P., Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Starobin v. Northridge Lakes Development Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Moritz v. Medical Arts Clinic, P. C.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  4. DiMiceli v. KliegerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Schaefer v. State BarWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API