Legal Opinion

DiMiceli v. Klieger

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 1973No. 285PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobert W. Hansen, J.

This is an appeal from an order denying defendant’s motion for summary judgment in a libel action. Two issues are raised. Three will be discussed.

The test. Not raised, at least at the summary judgment stage, is the question of whether the letter sent was or could be considered defamatory. In this state and else where, a communication is defamatory “. . . if it tends so to harm the reputation of another as to lower him in the estimation of the community or to deter third persons from associating or dealing with him.” The test is whether the communication is capable of such meaning. If…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Lathan v. Journal Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Frinzi v. HansonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Martin v. Outboard Marine Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Ranous v. HughesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Marshall v. MilesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Prahl v. BrosamleCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1980
  2. Bergman v. HupyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Fields Foundation, Ltd. v. ChristensenCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1981
  4. Vultaggio v. YaskoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
  5. D. R. W. Corporation v. CordesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API