Legal Opinion
United States v. Heng Awkak Roman
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 19, 1973No. 72 Cr. 1325PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FREDERICK van PELT BRYAN, District Judge:
Defendants Heng Roman (Heng) and Lee Koo (Koo) were tried before me without a jury on a two-count indictment charging them in count I with conspiracy to violate the narcotics laws, 21 U.S.C. §§ 846, 963, and in count II with possession of 2.5 kilograms of heroin, in the Southern District of New York on November 20, 1972, with intent to distribute, 21 U.S.C. §§ 812, 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(A). At the conclusion of the four-day trial, I found both defendants guilty on the conspiracy count (count I), and reserved decision on the substantive count…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Hyde v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Osborn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. CoplonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
- United States v. Ralph 'Whitey' Tropiano, Lawrence R. Pellegrino and William Grasso,defendants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- In Re Guilty Plea CasesMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
- United States v. John Bagnariol, United States of America v. Gordon L. Walgren, United States of America v. Patrick GallagherCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Roy MandujanoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- United States v. Martin Molina Oviedo, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- United States v. WilsonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1983
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.