Legal Opinion
Kar v. Nanda
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided January 13, 2011No. Docket No. 292754PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSaad, J.
In this divorce action, defendant Sunaina Nanda appeals an order that denied defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.
I. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS
Defendant maintains that the circuit court lacks subject-matter jurisdiction because, pursuant to MCL 552.9(1), a court “shall not” grant a judgment of divorce unless the complainant or defendant “has resided in this state for 180 days immediately preceding the filing of the complaint,” and according to defendant, neither party meets this residency requirement. The record reflects…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Williams v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Bush v. ShabahangMichigan Supreme Court · 2009
- Robinson v. City of LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 2010
- Oakland County Board v. Michigan Property & Casualty Guaranty Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
- Briggs Tax Service, LLC v. Detroit Public SchoolsMichigan Supreme Court · 2010
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Delta Business Center LLC v. Delta Charter TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 2019
- Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. Andrew HargreavesMichigan Court of Appeals · 2020
- Michael Zoran v. Township of CottrellvilleMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015
- Nancy Mobley v. Usaa Casualty Insurance CompanyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2020
- Silas T McAdoo v. City of LudingtonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2020
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.