Legal Opinion

HiTex, LLC v. Vorel

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Decided March 20, 2025No. 5:21-cv-01125Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA HI-TEX, LLC, ) a Nevada limited liability company, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Case No. CIV-21-1125-D v. ) ) PAUL M. VOREL, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ORDER Before the Court are the following Daubert motions, in which the parties seek to exclude the opposing party’s retained expert witness: • Plaintiff’s Daubert Motion to Strike Defendants’ Expert Witness Ted Blodgett and Exhibits [Doc. No. 86] (the “Blodgett Motion”); and • Defendants John Ernest Light, Tina S. Light, and Investors Services, Inc.’s Motion to Exclude Expert Report…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. Doris Berry, Personal Representative of the Estate of Lee F. Berry, Jr., Deceased v. City of DetroitCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  3. United States v. NacchioCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
  4. Katie Bonner, Esau Bonner v. Isp Technologies, Inc., Crawford & Company, Inc., MovantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
  5. Ralston v. Smith & Nephew Richards, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API