Legal Opinion
Moore v. Mitchell
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided January 18, 2008No. 1:00-cr-00023PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART SUPPLEMENTAL PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
SUSAN J. DLOTT, District Judge.
In this case, Chief Judge Magistrate Michael R. Merz has recommended that the Supplemental Petition for Writ of Ha-beas Corpus (“Supplemental Petition”) (doc. 29) filed by Petitioner Lee E. Moore be conditionally granted in part and denied in part. Pending before the Court are Chief Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz’s Report and Recommendations (“the R & R”) (doc. 128), the Warden’s Objections to the R & R (doc. 130), and Petitioner’s Objections to the R & R (doc. 132); plus…
2Cases cited150 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
145 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Lee Moore v. Betty MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- Drummond v. HoukDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2010
- Cowans v. BagleyDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2008
- Sowell v. CollinsDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2008
- Elder v. BerghuisDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.