Legal Opinion
Bielec v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided March 17, 1972No. 110-67; No. 111-67; No. 112-67; No. 113-67; No. 114-67; No. 115-67; No. 116-67PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSkelton, Judge
The plaintiffs, William F. Bielec, John H. Blisard, Seldon Van Buskirk, Herbert Mukhalian, Albert Schooley, James A. Sitley, and Phillip Steinman, filed separate suits against the United States, which were consolidated for trial because all of them involved the same issues. The facts are stipulated by the parties.
The plaintiffs are all career civil service employees in the Department of Defense. They claim entitlement to promotions to higher grades and ranks in the service by reason of an alleged upgrading of positions they were temporarily occupying without a corresponding promotion of the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. McLeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Leonard J. Ganse v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- Coleman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1943
- Keener v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
- Charles R. Armstrong v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Adolph Kizas v. William H. Webster, Adolph Kizas v. William H. WebsterCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- Local 2855, AFGE (AFL-CIO) v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
- Baker v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980
- Joseph F. Dugan v. Arch Ramsay, Director of the Office of Personnel ManagementCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
- Featheringill v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1978
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.