People v. Thomas
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Case held, decision reserved and matter remitted to Monroe County Court, Mark, J., for further proceedings in accordance with the following memorandum: The defendants should have been afforded an identification hearing. Approximately one month after the crime occurred, the victim of the assault, a New York State Trooper, made his initial identification of the defendants when he was shown their photo; graphs in connection with his appearance before the Grand Jury. Since "any improperly suggestive viewing at any time may constitute a violation of due process of law” (People v Blake, 35 NY2d…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. BlakeNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- People v. CarterNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
- In re James H.New York Court of Appeals · 1974
- People v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
- People v. Leite, New York County Courts1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. ThomasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- People v. TanksleyNew York Supreme Court · 1983
- People v. Smith, New York County Courts1980
- People v. TwittyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- People v. FreemanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978