Legal Opinion

People v. Thomas

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 20, 1978PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Case held, decision reserved and matter remitted to Monroe County Court, Mark, J., for further proceedings in accordance with the following memorandum: The defendants should have been afforded an identification hearing. Approximately one month after the crime occurred, the victim of the assault, a New York State Trooper, made his initial identification of the defendants when he was shown their photo; graphs in connection with his appearance before the Grand Jury. Since "any improperly suggestive viewing at any time may constitute a violation of due process of law” (People v Blake, 35 NY2d…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. BlakeNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. People v. CarterNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. In re James H.New York Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. People v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
  5. People v. Leite, New York County Courts1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. ThomasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  2. People v. TanksleyNew York Supreme Court · 1983
  3. People v. Smith, New York County Courts1980
  4. People v. TwittyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  5. People v. FreemanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API