Legal Opinion

People v. Tanksley

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1983PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Gloria Goldstein, J.

Defendant Kenneth Tanksley moves to inspect the Grand Jury minutes and to dismiss the indictment against him on the grounds that the- evidence presented was not sufficient to sustain the indictment and that the Grand Jury proceedings were defective within the meaning of CPL 210.20 (subd 1, par [c]) and 210.35 (subd 5).

This court has examined the Grand Jury minutes and finds that the proceedings were proper and the evidence sufficient to establish a prima facie case.

Defendant is charged with robbery in the first and second degrees, grand larceny in the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. People v. GriffinNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
  3. People v. OakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
  4. People v. LindsayNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. People v. GonzalezNew York Court of Appeals · 1970

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. WatsonNew York Supreme Court · 1984
  2. People v. TwittyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API