Legal Opinion
Mulhall v. Unite Here Local 355
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided September 10, 2010No. 09-12683PublishedCited by 80 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARCUS, Circuit Judge:
Martin Mulhall (“Mulhall”), an employee at the Hollywood Greyhound Track, Inc., d/b/a Mardi Gras Gaming (“Mardi Gras”), appeals from the district court’s dismissal of his complaint against Mardi Gras and UNITE HERE Local 355 (“Unite”), a labor union, for violations of § 302 of the Labor Management Relations Act (“LMRA”). Mulhall sued Unite and Mardi Gras to enjoin enforcement of a Memorandum of Agreement (“MOA”), whereby Unite agreed to spend money in support of Mardi Gras’ public campaign to obtain a gaming license, in exchange for Mardi Gras’ assistance in making Unite…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by80 opinions
- Duty Free Americas, Inc. v. The Estee Lauder Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
- Hollywood Mobile Estates Ltd. v. Seminole TribeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
- Marnika Lewis v. Governor of AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
- Florida Wildlife Federation, Inc. v. South Florida Water Management DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
- Jennifer Parrish v. Governor Mark DaytonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.