Legal Opinion
Burrell v. Armijo
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided July 24, 2006No. 03-2223PublishedCited by 55 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRISCOE, Circuit Judge.
Bob and Susan Burrell (“the Burrells”) filed this action against the Santa Ana Pueblo (“the Pueblo”), a federally recognized Indian tribe; Leonard Armijo, Governor of the Pueblo; Lawrence Montoya, Lieutenant Governor of the Pueblo; Nathan Tsosie, Tribal Administrator of the Pueblo; and Jerry Kinsman, Farm Administrator of the Pueblo, for violations of their civil rights pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1983, and 1985, as well as claims for breach of a federal farm lease and “respondeat superior.” The district court initially stayed the case so that the Bur-rells could…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Santa Clara Pueblo v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Hilton v. GuyotSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- National Farmers Union Insurance v. Crow Tribe of IndiansSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Moss v. KoppCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Crowe & Dunlevy, P.C. v. StidhamCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- Denver Homeless Out Loud v. Denver, ColoradoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2022
- Rhoten v. DicksonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
- Valenzuela v. SilversmithCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.