Claim of Pifumer v. Rheinstein & Haas, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendants, Rheinstein & Haas, Inc., and another, from an award of the State Industrial Commission, entered in the office of said Commission on the 2d day of July, 1918.
1Opinion of the Court
Woodward, J.:
The accident on August 8, 1917, resulting in the death of John Pifumer on the same day occurred at Syracuse, while the decedent was employed by Rheinstein & Haas, Inc., of New York, in the construction of a building. There *822is no question about the accidental character of the death, or of any of the conditions of liability. The decedent had no wife or children, and the State Industrial Commission, under the provisions of section 17 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law (Consol. Laws, chap. 67 [Laws of 1914, chap. 41], as amd. by Laws of 1916, chap. 622), has made an award to both the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Matter of Belcher v. . Carthage Machine Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Claim of Casella v. McCormickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
3Cited by8 opinions
- Claim of Grillo v. Sherman-Stalter Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
- In re the Estate of AsterioNew York Surrogate's Court · 1939
- Claim of Hunko v. Buffalo Crushed Stone Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
- Claim of Profeta v. Retsof Mining Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
- Claim of Eretza v. Fort Montgomery Iron WorksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.