Claim of Casella v. McCormick
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendants, Thomas E. McCormick and by the Superintendent of Insurance of the State of New York, as liquidator of the insurance carrier, from an award and decision of the State Industrial Commission dated on the 25th day of May, 1917.
1Opinion of the Court
Kellogg, P. J.:
Section 17 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law (Consol. Laws, chap. 67 [Laws of 1914, chap. 41], as amd. by Laws of 1916, chap. 622) does not grant any compensation; it is a limitation upon grants otherwise made. Section 16, subdivision 4, as thus amended, provides a compensation of twenty-five per cent of the average wages “ for the support of each parent, or grandparent, of the deceased if dependent upon him at the time of the accident.” Dependency at the time of the accident is the controlling feature there. Section 17 provides that non-resident aliens shall have, the same…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Claim of Pifumer v. Rheinstein & Haas, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
- Frasca v. City Coal Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1922
- Claim of Moran v. Rodgers & Hagerty, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
- In re LongAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
- Claim of Profeta v. Retsof Mining Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.