Legal Opinion

Claim of Eretza v. Fort Montgomery Iron Works

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 18, 1920PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal by the defendants, Fort Montgomery Iron Works and another, from an award of the State Industrial Commission, entered in the office of the said Commission on the 24th day of February, 1919, and also from an award of the said Commission entered in the office thereof on the 11th day of November, 1919.

1Opinion of the Court

Woodward, J.:

The employer and the insurance carrier appeal from an award made to the father of Placido Sagardi, a resident of Spain, on the ground of dependency. The appellants contend *818that there is no competent evidence of dependency on the part of Florentino Sagardi Eretza, the father, and that no claim was filed in the office of the Commission within the time fixed by the Workmen’s Compensation Law. (See § 28, as since amd. by Laws of 1918, chap. 634.) The injuries were received on August 12, 1916, and resulted in death on the same day.

One of the Commissioners writes an opinion in this…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Birmingham v. Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
  2. Claim of Pifumer v. Rheinstein & Haas, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Claim of Davis v. West End Brewing CoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API