Legal Opinion

Crump v. B & P Construction Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided January 21, 1986PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TATUM, Special Justice.

This is a Workers’ Compensation case in which four issues are presented for our review. The principal issue involves the construction of T.C.A. § 50-6-207(3)(C), which deals with concurrent injuries resulting in concurrent disabilities.

On July 21, 1982, the plaintiff-appellee, Randy Crump, was installing underground cables for a television line while in the course of his employment for the defendant-appellant, B & P Construction Company, when he was surprised by an unleashed dog. While attempting to flee from the dog, he tripped over a pile of lumber and fell,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Russell v. Genesco, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Ogle v. Tennessee Eastman Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Shores v. ShoresTennessee Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Griffith v. GoforthTennessee Supreme Court · 1946
  5. New Jersey Zinc Co. v. ColeTennessee Supreme Court · 1975

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Woodrow Sterling v. Velsicol Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
  2. Martin v. Lear CorporationTennessee Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Reagan v. Tennessee Municipal LeagueTennessee Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Wade v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Kerr v. Magic Chef, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API