New Jersey Zinc Co. v. Cole
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PONES, Chief Justice.
Plaintiff Cole was awarded workmen’s compensation benefits for a “closely related” occupational disease and defendant, New Jersey Zinc Company, his employer, appeals.
Defendant has assigned seven (7) errors, and the principal issue raised is whether the medical proof is sufficient to establish that plaintiff suffers from an occupational disease closely related to those named in T.C.A. § 50-1101 and having its origin and cause in a risk connected with his employment by defendant.
I
Plaintiff worked for defendant for more than sixteen (16) years, beginning in April,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sundquist v. Madison Railways Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
- State Realty Co. v. LigonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Whitehead v. Holston Defense CorporationTennessee Supreme Court · 1959
- Fidelity and Casualty Co. of New York v. TreadwellTennessee Supreme Court · 1963
- Maryland Casualty Company v. MillerTennessee Supreme Court · 1962
3Cited by16 opinions
- Russell v. Genesco, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1983
- Evans v. WilsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1989
- Porter v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1987
- Giles County Board of Education v. HickmanTennessee Supreme Court · 1977
- Crump v. B & P Construction Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1986
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.