Von Mumm v. Frash
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern New York
In Equity. Bill by Peter Herman Von Mumm, doing business as G-. H. Mumm & Co., and others, against Christian C. Erash and Caroline E. í- i-a-'-h. composing tlie firm of Fresh & Co., to enjoin the infringement of a, trade-mark, etc. Decree for complainants.
1Opinion of the Court
BENEDICT, District Judge.
This is a salt in equity, brought by G-. IT. Mumm & Co., manufacturers of champagne wine, to restrain the defendants from infringing their trade-mark, and from conducting- an unfair competition, by manufacturing and sidling their iuam-facture put up in a form calculated to induce its purchase as the champagne wine known as “G-. H. Mumm & Co.’s Extra Dry.” The following facts appear by the testimony: The complainants are aliens engaged in the production of champagne wine at Reims, in the republic of France, under the style of G. II. 'Mumm & Co. Their business was…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Coats v. Merrick Thread Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Koehler v. . SandersNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- People v. HaynesCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1835
3Cited by32 opinions
- Federal Trade Commission v. Winsted Hosiery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- O. & W. Thum Co. v. DickinsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1917
- American Philatelic Society v. ClaibourneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. McConnellU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Middle Tennessee · 1897
- John Morrell & Co. v. DoyleCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1938
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.