Legal Opinion
Sampson v. City of Cambridge
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided April 30, 2008No. WDQ-06-1819PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BETH P. GESNER, United States Magistrate Judge.
This case has been referred to me for the *175resolution of discovery disputes.1 28 U.S.C. § 636. Currently pending2 are: (1) Plaintiffs Motion to Sanction Defendant for Spoliation of Evidence and to Grant Default Judgment or Adverse Jury Instruction (“First Motion for Sanctions”) with supporting Memorandum of Law, plaintiffs Supplement, defendant’s Response in Opposition, and plaintiffs Reply (Paper Nos. 62, 63, 85, 114, 115); and (2) Plaintiffs Motion to Sanction Defendant for Suppression of Relevant Evidence (“Second Motion for…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Mark N. Silvestri v. General Motors Corporation, Dfendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
- Zubulake v. UBS Warburg LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Vodusek v. Bayliner Marine Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
- Mutual Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Richards & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Victor Stanley, Inc. v. Creative Pipe, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2010
- Rimkus Consulting Group, Inc. v. CammarataDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2010
- Goodman v. Praxair Services, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2009
- Surowiec v. Capital Title Agency, Inc.District Court, D. Arizona · 2011
- Hawkins v. LeggettDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2013
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.