State v. Ramey
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Gorman, Judge.
The defendant-appellant, Rudy L. Ramey, appeals from his conviction, following a no-contest plea, on the charge of driving under the influence of alcohol in violation of R.C. 4511.19(A)(3). In his single assignment of error, Ramey contends that the trial court erred by failing to grant his motion to suppress. Specifically, he argues that a citizen tip that his vehicle had been observed driving erratically, relayed over the police radio, lacked sufficient corroboration to justify the subsequent investigatory stop of his vehicle that led to his arrest. For the reasons that follow,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- City of Maumee v. WeisnerOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- Maumee v. WeisnerOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. SlaterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1999
- State v. Tidwell (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2021
- Anderson v. Director, North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.