Legal Opinion

City of Maumee v. Weisner

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1999No. 1998-2016PublishedCited by 252 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCook, J.

This case involves a Fourth Amendment challenge to an officer’s stop of a suspected drunk driver. Specifically, we have been asked to determine whether a citizen informant’s telephone tip may provide the sole basis for an officer’s stop of a motorist suspected of driving under the influence. We resolve this issue in favor of the city of Maumee and hold that a telephone tip can, by itself, create reasonable suspicion justifying an investigative stop where the tip has sufficient indicia of reliability.

I. Burden of Proof at Suppression Hearing

A

As a preliminary matter, we must resolve a debate…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. United States v. RaddatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by252 opinions

  1. State v. MooreOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. DunnOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Maumee v. WeisnerOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  4. State v. EdwardsOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  5. State v. GartrellOhio Court of Appeals · 2014

247 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API