Legal Opinion

Demaray v. Dept. of Environmental Quality

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 20, 1994No. 90C11264; CA A75793PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*496LEESON, J.

Plaintiff brought tort claims against the Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) and several DEQ employees arising out of his discharge from employment with DEQ. The trial court granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment. We review the record in the light most favorable to plaintiff, the nonmoving party, to determine whether defendants are entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Stevens v. Bispham, 316 Or 221, 223, 851 P2d 556 (1993). We reverse in part and remand.

Plaintiff worked for DEQ for nearly 15 years. During his tenure, he was a vocal critic, both publicly and by…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Hafer v. MeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Draper v. Astoria School District No. 1CDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1998
  2. Patton v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 2005
  3. Huber v. Oregon Department of EducationCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  4. Demaray v. Dept. of Environmental QualityCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API