Legal Opinion

State v. Lankford

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 1987No. 15760, 16170PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAKES, Justice.

Bryan Lankford was convicted by a jury of two counts of first degree murder for the killings of Robert and Cheryl Bravence. Following the trial, the district court held a sentencing hearing and sentenced the defendant to death. Lankford appeals this conviction and sentence and the district court’s denial of his petition for post conviction relief before the same court, which was denied after a hearing. The appeals have been consolidated pursuant to I.C. § 19-2719. This matter is additionally before the Court under the statutory provisions of I.C. § 19-2827 which provides for…

2Cases cited85 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Rose v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Enmund v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. McMillan v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Dobbert v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Lankford v. IdahoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. State v. PizzutoIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. LankfordIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State v. EnnoIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Gerald Ross Pizzuto, Jr. v. A.J. Arave, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API