Legal Opinion

Sea-Land Service, Inc. v. Hall

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided November 6, 1967No. 67 Civ. 4205PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WEINFELD, District Judge.

Plaintiff and the defendant union are parties to a collective bargaining agreement in an industry affecting commerce, which contains a “no-strike provision.” Plaintiff, alleging a breach, commenced an action in the Supreme Court of the State of New York for an injunction enjoining the defendants from striking, or causing or advising a strike. An ex parte injunction was issued. The agreement contains an arbitration provision, but the arbitral procedure was not invoked by the plaintiff. The complaint does not seek money damages, but only injunctive and “ * * *…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Local 174, Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers v. Lucas Flour Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Charles Dowd Box Co. v. CourtneySupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Sinclair Refining Co. v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Avco Corporation v. Aero Lodge No. 735, International Association of MacHinists and AerospaceworkersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1967

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kayser-Roth Hosiery Co. v. Textile Workers UnionDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API