Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Upper Scioto Drainage & Conservancy District v. Tracy

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1932No. 22875PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStepheNSON, J.

The petition and amendment do state facts sufficient to constitute a canse of action against the defendant, and show ample grounds for the relief sought under the statutory provisions as they exist. The main question here is whether or not these statutes are unconstitutional; or, if constitutional, whether they are violative of the compact between the United States and the state of Ohio whereby the lands contained in section 16 were obtained, if such question is raised by the demurrer.

Relator pleads that defendant as auditor of state and as state supervisor of school and ministerial lands…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co. v. DeyU.S. Circuit Court for the Southern District of Iowa · 1888
  2. Jackson v. Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Besl Corp. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Sekerak v. Fairhill Mental Health CenterOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Samsell v. State Line Development CompanyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Nordonia Landscape Supplies, L.L.C. v. AkronOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  5. Trustees of German Township v. Farmers & Citizens Sav. Bank Co.Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas · 1953

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API