Sekerak v. Fairhill Mental Health Center
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
It is well-settled that as a general rule “* * * the principle of estoppel does not apply against a state or its agencies in the exercise of a governmental function.” Besl Corp. v. Pub. Util. Comm. (1976), 45 Ohio St. 2d 146, 150 [74 O.O.2d 262], citing, inter alia, State, ex rel. Upper Scioto Drainage & Conserv. Dist., v. Tracy (1932), 125 Ohio St. 399; State, ex rel. Kildrow, v. Indus. Comm. (1934), 128 Ohio St. 573 [1 O.O. 235]; Interstate Motor Freight System v. Donahue (1966), 8 Ohio St. 2d 19. See, also, Griffith v. J. C. Penney Co. (1986), 24 Ohio St. 3d 112, at 113-114; Chevalier v.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Fox v. Eaton Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1976
- State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1934
- Besl Corp. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1976
- State ex rel. Chevalier v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 1985
- Griffith v. J.C. Penney Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Ohio State Board of Pharmacy v. FrantzOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- Hortman v. City of MiamisburgOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- Sun Refining & Marketing Co. v. BrennanOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- Crown Communication, Inc. v. TestaOhio Supreme Court · 2013
- State Ex Rel. Shumway v. State Teachers Retirement BoardOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.