Legal Opinion

Sekerak v. Fairhill Mental Health Center

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 16, 1986No. 85-1148PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Per curiam

It is well-settled that as a general rule “* * * the principle of estoppel does not apply against a state or its agencies in the exercise of a governmental function.” Besl Corp. v. Pub. Util. Comm. (1976), 45 Ohio St. 2d 146, 150 [74 O.O.2d 262], citing, inter alia, State, ex rel. Upper Scioto Drainage & Conserv. Dist., v. Tracy (1932), 125 Ohio St. 399; State, ex rel. Kildrow, v. Indus. Comm. (1934), 128 Ohio St. 573 [1 O.O. 235]; Interstate Motor Freight System v. Donahue (1966), 8 Ohio St. 2d 19. See, also, Griffith v. J. C. Penney Co. (1986), 24 Ohio St. 3d 112, at 113-114; Chevalier v.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Fox v. Eaton Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1976
  2. State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Besl Corp. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  4. State ex rel. Chevalier v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Griffith v. J.C. Penney Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Ohio State Board of Pharmacy v. FrantzOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Hortman v. City of MiamisburgOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Sun Refining & Marketing Co. v. BrennanOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Crown Communication, Inc. v. TestaOhio Supreme Court · 2013
  5. State Ex Rel. Shumway v. State Teachers Retirement BoardOhio Court of Appeals · 1996

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API