Legal Opinion

Hunt v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided August 4, 2010No. Civil Action 03-900 (RWR)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

RICHARD W. ROBERTS, District Judge.

Plaintiff Marla Hunt sued DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. (“DePuy”), manufacturer of her prosthetic hip, for breach of implied warranties, breach of express warranty, and replevin. DePuy filed a motion for summary judgment, which was granted with respect to all of Hunt’s claims except for replevin, and now moves again for summary judgment on the replevin claim. Because Hunt’s abandonment of the prosthetic hip components is a complete defense to her replevin claim, DePuy’s motion for summary judgment will be granted.

BACKGROUND

The background of this…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Moore v. HartmanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
  5. American Petroleum Institute,petitioners v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Chemical Manufacturers Association, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Solomon v. GarlandDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024
  2. United States v. NavarroDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API