Legal Opinion

In re of D.J.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 28, 2003No. 05-02-01018-CVPublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by Justice FARRIS (Retired).

In eight points of error, Ginger J. (Mother) and Kelvin J. (Father) contend the judgment terminating their parental rights to D.J. must be reversed because (1) the evidence is factually insufficient to support the jury’s findings that (a) Mother’s and Father’s parental rights should be terminated and (b) termination of the parent-child relationship was in D.J.’s best interest; and (2) the trial court erred by denying Mother’s and Father’s motion for new trial. We affirm the trial court’s judgment terminating Father’s parental rights. Because there is…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In the interest of C.H.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
  2. In the Interest of J.F.C.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Holley v. AdamsTexas Supreme Court · 1976
  4. In the Interest of D.T.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2000
  5. Dupree v. Texas Department of Protective & Regulatory Services, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Sexton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
  2. in the Interest of S.N., a Child, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2008
  3. in the Interest of L.C., L.C., Children, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2004
  4. In the Interest of J.W.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2004
  5. In the Interest of J.A.J., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2006

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API