Legal Opinion

Romo v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 23, 2010No. 49A04-1003-CR-143PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DARDEN, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Noe Romo appeals his convictions for three counts of class A felony dealing in cocaine. 1

We affirm.

ISSUES

1. Whether the trial court erred in admitting transcripts of the taped drug transactions.

2. Whether the State failed to establish a proper foundation for the transcripts.

3. Whether the trial court improperly permitted a witness to give opinion testimony without a proper foundation.

FACTS 2

Confidential informant, S.S8., entered into an agreement with Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department ("IMPD") to assist law enforcement by conducting covert…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. Concepcion Carrasco and Francisco DiazCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  2. Bryan v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Small v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State v. AugustineIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. Julian v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Romo v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API