Romo v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DARDEN, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Noe Romo appeals his convictions for three counts of class A felony dealing in cocaine. 1
We affirm.
ISSUES
1. Whether the trial court erred in admitting transcripts of the taped drug transactions.
2. Whether the State failed to establish a proper foundation for the transcripts.
3. Whether the trial court improperly permitted a witness to give opinion testimony without a proper foundation.
FACTS 2
Confidential informant, S.S8., entered into an agreement with Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department ("IMPD") to assist law enforcement by conducting covert…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. Concepcion Carrasco and Francisco DiazCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- Bryan v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1983
- Small v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. AugustineIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
- Julian v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Romo v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2011