Legal Opinion

Romo v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 9, 2011No. 49S04-1009-CR-499PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DICKSON, Justice.

In the defendant's trial on three counts of Dealing in Cocaine or Narcotic Drugs, a class A felony, the evidence included an English language translation transcript of clandestinely recorded conversations in Spanish between the defendant and a police informant during the commission of the offenses. The jury found the defendant guilty on all charges, and the trial court entered judgmerit and sentenced accordingly. The Indiana Court of Appeals affirmed. Romo v. State, 929 N.E.2d 805 (Ind.Ct.App.2010). We granted transfer and now affirm the convictions, holding that written…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. Phillip Onori and Theodore BukkyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  2. United States v. Grajales-MontoyaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
  3. Small v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
  4. United States v. Rafael Valencia and Luis Arturo PenaflorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
  5. United States v. Rosario Placensia, Also Known as Cheyenne, Also Known as JaimeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. ChavezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
  2. State v. Enrique Lomeli RodriguezIdaho Court of Appeals · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API