Legal Opinion
Petersen v. Rapid City, Pierre & Eastern Railroad, Inc.
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided October 4, 2023No. 5:22-cv-05064Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA WESTERN DIVISION KENNETH W. PETERSEN, JR. 5:22-CV-5064 Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER vs GRANTING MOTION FOR RULE 35 EXAMINATION BY DR. RONE RAPID CITY, PIERRE & EASTERN R.R., INC. Defendant. Pending before the Court is Defendant Rapid City, Pierre & Eastern R.R. Inc.’s Motion (“RCPE”) for Rule 35 Examination by Dr. Rone (Doc. 36) and motion to modify scheduling order. For the following reasons, RCPE’s Motion is granted. BACKGROUND □ On March 24, 2023, Mr. Petersen’s retained expert psychiatrist, Dr. Kenneth Weiss, reviewed…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Schlagenhauf v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Sherman v. Winco Fireworks, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- Gaylon Hofer v. Mack Trucks, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
- Gowan v. Mid Century InsuranceDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2015
- Abdulwali v. Washington Metro Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.