Legal Opinion
United States v. Carpenter's Goldfish Farm, United States of America v. Marvin Carpenter
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 8, 1993No. 92-10342, 92-10343PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NOONAN, Circuit Judge:
Marvin Carpenter was found by this court to have been wrongly convicted under the Lacey Act, 16 U.S.C. § 3372, and his case was remanded for sentencing for the other offenses he had committed. United States v. Carpenter, 933 F.2d 748, 762 (9th Cir.1991). He now appeals his new sentence. We reverse and remand for resentencing.
PROCEEDINGS
Carpenter was convicted of making a false statement to the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (the Service) in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001; of killing migratory birds in violation of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, 16 U.S.C. §§ 703,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Sparf v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- United States v. Terry James KohlCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Marvin Carpenter, United States of America v. Carpenter's Goldfish FarmCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Thomas Whatley BodifordCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. NewlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4655, 97 Daily Journal D.A.R. 7690 United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Nick Newland, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Robert Leroy SandvigCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996