Legal Opinion
United States v. Newland
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 19, 1997No. Nos. 96-10208, 96-10249PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
D. W. NELSON, Circuit Judge:
Nick Newland appeals the sentence imposed upon his jury conviction of two counts of conspiracy and three counts of money laundering. Newland contends that the district court erred in applying § 4B1.1, the career offender provision of the United' States Sentencing Guidelines. The government also appeals the sentence and contends that the district court erred because it refused to consider drug quantities imported and possessed by Newland’s coconspirators when it determined Newland’s base offense level for conspiracy. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States v. WattsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States v. KennedyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Leon BradyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- United States v. BlitzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Natividad Duran, United States of America v. Martin Roman, United States of America v. Rodolfo Almaraz MoraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Otis W. Fellows, IIICourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard Harold STODDARD, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Emanuel MarseilleCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.