Legal Opinion
Olympia Mortgage Corp. v. Klein
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided January 2, 2001No. AC 20086PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LAVERY, C. J.
The plaintiff, Olympia Mortgage Corporation, appeals from the trial court’s judgment dismissing its complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The plaintiff claims that the court improperly granted the motion to dismiss the complaint because it failed *306to allow the plaintiff to amend its civil process pursuant to General Statutes § 52-72 (a)1 to cure the defect in the process made returnable more than two months from the date of service of process. We agree with the plaintiff and reverse the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts and procedural history are…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Concept Associates, Ltd. v. Board of Tax ReviewSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Coppola v. CoppolaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Haigh v. HaighConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
3Cited by11 opinions
- In re Shonna K.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Millward Brown, Inc. v. Commissioner of Revenue ServicesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Kindl v. Department of Social ServicesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Russo v. Common CouncilConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Filippi v. SullivanConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.