Legal Opinion
Samuel v. University of Pittsburgh
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided June 6, 1975No. Civ. A. 71-1202PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TEITELBAUM, District Judge.
This protracted litigation is now before the Court for resolution of its final aspects. However, before the substantive aspects of the case may be dealt with it is necessary to resolve a preliminary matter.
MOTION FOR DISQUALIFICATION
Counsel for plaintiffs, Michael P. Malakoff, has moved the Court to recuse itself under 28 U.S.C. § 144 and 28 U.S. C. § 455(b)(1). Section 144 of the Judicial Code reads as follows:
Whenever a party to any proceeding in a district court makes and files a timely and sufficient affidavit that the judge before whom the matter is…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Wood v. StricklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Reed v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- United States v. HaldemanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
- In Re International Business MacHines Corporation, United States of America v. International Business MacHines CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Richard J. Mayberry v. James F. Maroney, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution, Pittsburgh, PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Potashnick v. Port City Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Furst, Sidney D.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.