Kendall v. Bishop
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Kent. (Grove, J.) Replevin. Defendant brings error. The facts, and points of counsel passed upon by the Court, are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.
Defendant, as sheriff of Kent county, levied *635on the machinery, fixtures, and stock, finished and unfinished, and personal property, of the Sherwood Manufacturing Company, so far as remaining in the factory, under attachments for debts to the amount of $938.47, on the eighth of June, 1888, and plaintiff replevied them. The only question in the case is whether, as against creditors of the attachment debtor, the arrangement under which Kendall held the property was valid.
He set up his claim under a document in writing, executed, by the president and treasurer of the manufacturing company on the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Reuben Town v. President of the Bank of River RaisinMichigan Supreme Court · 1847
3Cited by25 opinions
- Bank of Montreal v. J. E. Potts Salt & Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1892
- Cluett v. RosenthalMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
- Warner v. LittlefieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
- Brown v. Grand Rapids Parlor Furniture Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1893
- Sheldon v. MannMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.