Legal Opinion
State v. Hoover
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided September 30, 2009No. 2007-2295PublishedCited by 60 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLanzinger, J.
*419{¶ 1} In this case, we consider the constitutionality of R.C. 4511.19(A)(2), which requires the imposition of criminal penalties upon certain persons who refuse to consent to chemical testing after being arrested for operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol or a drug of abuse (“DUI”).1 We hold that R.C. 4511.19(A)(2) does not violate the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution or Section 14, Article I of the Ohio Constitution.
I. Factual and Procedural Background
{¶ 2} In the early morning hours of September 8, 2006, Deputy Kelly S. Nawman stopped a car after…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- City of Westerville v. CunninghamOhio Supreme Court · 1968
- State v. GustafsonOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. CollierOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- Doyle v. Ohio Bureau of Motor VehiclesOhio Supreme Court · 1990
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- State v. RyceSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016
- State v. NolingOhio Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. HarrisOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
- State v. SheppeardOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- State v. SiminOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.