Legal Opinion

Berger v. Village of Seneca Falls

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 1956PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFredric T. Henry, J.

The plaintiff herein seeks damages from the Village of Seneca Falls for two causes of action based on false arrest and false imprisonment and for a third based on malicious prosecution. The facts, briefly, are these. On March 8, 1953 at about 10:30 p.m., plaintiff was arrested by two members of the police force of the Village of Seneca Falls. The charge was disorderly conduct, and the arrest was made without a warrant although plaintiff’s complaint alleges that no act constituting the offense was committed in the presence of the arresting officers. The first cause of action is based on these…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bernardine v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1945
  2. Warner v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
  3. Nastasi v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
  4. Fishbein v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
  5. Farrell v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Miller v. Director, Middletown State HospitalDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1956
  2. Grant v. City of RochesterNew York Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Cole v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Claims · 1959
  4. Williams v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API