Legal Opinion
Grant v. City of Rochester
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 7, 1971PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMa-rrttat.t. E. Livingston, J.
This is a motion for permission to file an amended notice of claim and an amended complaint against the City of Rochester, pursuant to subdivision 6 of section 50-e of the General Municipal Law. The section cited does not include authority to permit the service of an amended complaint. That relief is governed by CPLR 3025 (subd. [b]). However, for the purpose of this motion, it is deemed that plaintiff intended to include his application to serve an amended complaint under the proper rule.
The background of this matter is an original claim against the City of Rochester and its police officer…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hopner v. . McGowanNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Andrews v. DonabellaNew York Supreme Court · 1969
- Berger v. Village of Seneca FallsNew York Supreme Court · 1956
- Nagy v. RothsteinNew York Supreme Court · 1966
- Claim of Davidson v. New York City Housing AuthorityNew York Supreme Court · 1968
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kalso Systemet, Inc. v. JacobsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1979
- Bank of Boston International v. Arguello TefelDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1986
- DeWeerth v. BaldingerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987
- Merrill Lynch Futures, Inc. v. MillerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- Worrell v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1979