Legal Opinion
Miller v. Director, Middletown State Hospital
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 30, 1956PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
IRVING R. KAUFMAN, District Judge.
Defendant appearing here by the Attorney General of the State of New York has moved for an order dismissing plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to Rule 12 (b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. on the ground that the Court lacks jurisdiction over the subject matter, lacks jurisdiction over the persons and that the complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The plaintiff appears pro se, and, as is not unusual in such a situation, his complaint is prolix, redundant and contains much irrelevant matter. As required by the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Mooney v. HolohanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Tenney v. BrandhoveSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Gregoire v. BiddleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
- Alabama Public Service Commission v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Watson v. BuckSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Greenwood v. RossCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- Greenwood v. RossCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- St. Clair E. Miller v. Hyman Pleasure, M.D., as Superintendent of Middletown State Hospital, Middletown, New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- Goss v. HutchinsTennessee Supreme Court · 1988
- Long v. AT & T Information Systems Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1990
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.