Legal Opinion
Conner v. Northwestern National Casualty Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided May 30, 1989No. 65571PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMERS, Justice.
When Plaintiff Lewis Conner sold his bait and tackle shop to the Andersons, he received $16,500.00 down and carried a first mortgage for $27,000.00 on the balance of the purchase price. The mortgage required Anderson to keep the property insured against fire loss for the benefit of Conner in the amount of the mortgage, and Anderson did so. The fire insurance policy with defendant Northwestern National Casualty Company contained a “Contract of Sale Clause” naming Conner as an additional insured.
The bait shop burned with the mortgage debt fully unpaid. Northwestern promptly…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. AnnunziataNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Hathaway v. Orient InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- St. Louis County National Bank v. Maryland Casualty Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1978
- Green v. Fidelity-Phenix Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Insurance Underwriters' Agency of the Insurance Co. of Pennsylvania v. PrideSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Willis v. Nowata Land and Cattle Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- McGINNITY v. KIRKSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2015
- Travelers Insurance Companies v. DickeySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
- HENSLEY v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY CO.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
- Spink v. GENERAL ACC. INS. CO. OF PUERTO RICODistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1999
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.